As the Cards begin their “second half”, they have many unanswered questions: Who will make up the rotation? Can Adam Wainwright stay healthy and as effective as he was in the first half? Will Shelby Miller ever improve? Can Allen Craig even step into the shadow of his 2013 performance? It’s a dizzying array of uncertainty that Cards brass has to mostly ignore and let work itself out.
If we had to write the synopsis of the 2013 Cardinals today, based on the first half, the story would be the maddeningly inconsistent offense. They have gotten better, but it feels like the bats are hanging by a thread. While everyone expected Allen Craig to regress toward the mean in 2014, many also expected a better performance from Matt Holliday in the first half.
It’s interesting that so many in sports media assume Holliday will improve in the second half. If I were Rush Limbaugh, I’d put together a media montage featuring all the bubble-headed bleach blondes who’ve been repeating this “fact”, clearly without researching it themselves. While it was true last year, it is definitely not always the case. Here’s his first half vs second half for 2013:
Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | TB | GDP | SH | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Half | 83 | 82 | 353 | 310 | 64 | 83 | 15 | 1 | 13 | 47 | 3 | 1 | 37 | 51 | .268 | .351 | .448 | .800 | 139 | 22 | 0 |
2nd Half | 58 | 58 | 249 | 210 | 39 | 73 | 16 | 0 | 9 | 47 | 3 | 0 | 32 | 35 | .348 | .442 | .552 | .994 | 116 | 9 | 0 |
A stark difference, to say the least. He was a different hitter after the break last year. At .348, he can pretty much carry the team. But let’s take a trip down our foggy memory lane. First stop, 2012:
Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | TB | GDP | HBP | SH | SF | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Half | 83 | 82 | 368 | 319 | 56 | 101 | 21 | 1 | 14 | 56 | 4 | 2 | 42 | 64 | .317 | .397 | .520 | .917 | 166 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
2nd Half | 74 | 72 | 320 | 280 | 39 | 76 | 15 | 1 | 13 | 46 | 0 | 2 | 33 | 68 | .271 | .359 | .471 | .831 | 132 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
He actually got noticeably worse in the second half of 2012. In pretty much every offensive category, he was down. Interestingly, he was nearly identical on homeruns. On to 2011:
Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | TB | GDP | HBP | SH | SF | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Half | 67 | 64 | 280 | 241 | 45 | 78 | 19 | 0 | 14 | 49 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 41 | .324 | .418 | .577 | .995 | 139 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
2nd Half | 57 | 55 | 236 | 205 | 38 | 54 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 27 | 52 | .263 | .352 | .463 | .815 | 95 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Again, he dips significantly in the second half. Homerun production is cut nearly in half this time. The second half of 2011 was a truly unremarkable performance for Holliday. In 2010, his performance fit the popular narrative:
Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | TB | GDP | HBP | SH | SF | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Half | 86 | 84 | 367 | 327 | 52 | 98 | 25 | 1 | 16 | 51 | 6 | 1 | 36 | 53 | .300 | .373 | .529 | .902 | 173 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
2nd Half | 72 | 72 | 308 | 269 | 43 | 88 | 20 | 0 | 12 | 52 | 3 | 4 | 33 | 40 | .327 | .409 | .535 | .944 | 144 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
Ah! There it is. He experiences a spike in his second half performance that moves him from great, to elite. On to 2009:
Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | TB | GDP | HBP | SH | SF | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Half | 85 | 84 | 365 | 315 | 42 | 87 | 19 | 1 | 8 | 43 | 10 | 3 | 43 | 56 | .276 | .373 | .419 | .792 | 132 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
2nd Half | 71 | 70 | 305 | 266 | 52 | 95 | 20 | 2 | 16 | 66 | 4 | 4 | 29 | 45 | .357 | .420 | .628 | 1.047 | 167 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
Last stop, 2008:
Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | TB | GDP | HBP | SH | SF | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Half | 79 | 79 | 356 | 309 | 52 | 104 | 21 | 2 | 14 | 51 | 13 | 1 | 42 | 59 | .337 | .421 | .553 | .975 | 171 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
2nd Half | 60 | 60 | 267 | 230 | 55 | 69 | 17 | 0 | 11 | 37 | 15 | 1 | 32 | 45 | .300 | .393 | .517 | .911 | 119 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
So, there is some merit to the thinking that Matt gets better in the second half, but he’s done it in only three of the last six years. It’s hardly a safe bet. There are some other reasons to believe he could significantly pick up the pace again this year, however. Look at his performance over the last few weeks of this season:
Split | G | GS | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | TB | GDP | HBP | SH | SF | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 Totals | 93 | 93 | 400 | 339 | 50 | 90 | 24 | 0 | 6 | 45 | 2 | 1 | 49 | 58 | .265 | .373 | .389 | .762 | 132 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 2 |
Last 7 days | 3 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | .300 | .417 | .800 | 1.217 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Last 14 days | 10 | 10 | 39 | 32 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | .281 | .410 | .469 | .879 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Last 28 days | 22 | 22 | 89 | 78 | 15 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 12 | .282 | .371 | .410 | .781 | 32 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Last 365days | 151 | 151 | 649 | 549 | 89 | 163 | 40 | 0 | 15 | 92 | 5 | 1 | 81 | 93 | .297 | .399 | .452 | .851 | 248 | 24 | 15 | 0 | 4 |
Here’s a guy who is at least .020 over his .265 season average over the past few weeks. That comprises well over 100 AB, so it’s not that small of a sample, either. He’s a career .309 hitter, and every year he proves people wrong. He starts slow, and about half the time he improves in the second half. The annual alarms going off about Matt’s age-related decline are as much a part of rooting for the Cardinals as declaring their season over sometime in May. He has the tools to put it together, and he has every year.
Having said all of that, it’s probably more important this year than others. For whatever reason, the Cards are just having trouble at the plate this year. Certainly that could not be said about the teams over any of the past few years. Matt could afford to slump when Pujols, or Beltran were around. This 2014 team just has not completely clicked yet, and a blockbuster season for Matt Holliday would cover a multitude of sins.